Time for a YT regulation change?

Discussion in 'Fishing Chit Chat' started by the SLIDER, Jan 7, 2018.

  1. Azarkon

    Azarkon I've posted enough I should edit this section

    Location:
    California
    Name:
    Joe
    Boat:
    N/A
    • Messages:
      (1,667)
    • Likes Received:
      (1,271)
    I don't question the fact that your feelings and concern are genuine; what I question is the value of feelings.

    This is a defense of ignorance. How in the world can you simply assume that you're doing right by the fish population when you don't even attempt to do the necessary research? How do you know a minimum size limit is going to result in significantly more quality fish? All the while marine biologists are increasingly warning about population structure destruction via selective targeting of large fish?
     
  2. Willdoggy

    Willdoggy Willing Member

    Location:
    Chula Vista
    Name:
    IG = WetWillyBiz
    Boat:
    Purr-Sea-Stance: Boston Whaler Montauk 170
    • Messages:
      (2,012)
    • Likes Received:
      (2,418)
    Hey how bout that global warming? :finger::gayfight:
     
    Hardcor, terryc. and crabdancer like this.
  3. crabdancer

    crabdancer Kook

    Location:
    LA/Santa Cruz
    Name:
    Shannon
    Boat:
    Edgewater
    • Messages:
      (418)
    • Likes Received:
      (448)
    IMG_1662.PNG
    Conehead, please stop with the 'we.' Represent yourself.

    I know the internet has this illusion that all are equal and so are their opinions, but you're arguing for the sake of arguing with people I've known and looked up to since before the internet.

    Since you've got the internet, google Kant's antinomy of pure reason. Basically if you argue a point to its bitter end the contradictions that eventually come into play negate the original position.

    Or, we could all go kill some fish. The choice is ours.
     
    the SLIDER likes this.
  4. fishkilr

    fishkilr on the water

    Location:
    long beach,ca.u.s.a.
    Name:
    alby
    Boat:
    Indian/Aahi/Inseine
    • Messages:
      (2,545)
    • Likes Received:
      (2,915)
    I only said I don't like to see small dead yellows...
    If to you that's ignorant then we come from two different worlds and the debate is pointless
     
    Yellowtail Dan likes this.
  5. Azarkon

    Azarkon I've posted enough I should edit this section

    Location:
    California
    Name:
    Joe
    Boat:
    N/A
    • Messages:
      (1,667)
    • Likes Received:
      (1,271)
    What's ignorant is to insist that research isn't needed before regulations are changed. I have no problem with you or anyone saying that you don't like to see small dead yellowtail. I do have a problem with saying no data is needed to justify a significant change in yellowtail laws.

    Fish management laws aren't and shouldn't be based on feelings. They should be based on solid evidence, nothing less. In case we can't agree on that then indeed, nothing more to discuss.
     
  6. fishkilr

    fishkilr on the water

    Location:
    long beach,ca.u.s.a.
    Name:
    alby
    Boat:
    Indian/Aahi/Inseine
    • Messages:
      (2,545)
    • Likes Received:
      (2,915)
    Your gonna have to show me where I said anything remotely close to that..
     
  7. Paddyman1

    Paddyman1 I love pangas

    Location:
    Left Coast
    Name:
    Steve
    Boat:
    N/A
    • Messages:
      (4,969)
    • Likes Received:
      (3,323)
    Ha ha! I knew this was going to turn into a fish photo frenzy! Bring'm on!
    paddyman.JPG
     
    carterantebi, Hardcor and colemans224 like this.
  8. Azarkon

    Azarkon I've posted enough I should edit this section

    Location:
    California
    Name:
    Joe
    Boat:
    N/A
    • Messages:
      (1,667)
    • Likes Received:
      (1,271)
    This is what I said:

    "This yellowtail scare is much closer to the latter than the former. It’s just like the marine protection zones, but worse because there they had a small amount of data and research to back them up where as here we have none.

    Like I said, it’s not hard to get informed and anyone who is informed know there’s been no recent studies of yellowtail populations and no anecdotal evidence either that the population is struggling. Any change would be based on fear rather than data."

    This is what you said:

    "Since you say over and over there is a lack of data on yellows shouldn't such a situation be treated carefully to protect such a regal fish...
    What you don't seem to get is that yellows are a top of the list fish for many guys that fish often... it is my personal favorite and seeing limits of dead peanut yellows killed before they got the opportunity to become that freight training structure seeking missile that we get the pleasure to battle makes a lot of guys sick...
    This species holds a special place in the hearts of many experienced guys and they will defend it regardless of data .."

    I was arguing that there needs to be data before any changes are made. You responded by saying this situation should be treated carefully and that "many experienced guys" like yourself will "defend it regardless of data..."

    So what's the argument here? I'm assuming you were talking about making it illegal to keep small fish.
     
    Last edited: Jan 11, 2018
  9. fishkilr

    fishkilr on the water

    Location:
    long beach,ca.u.s.a.
    Name:
    alby
    Boat:
    Indian/Aahi/Inseine
    • Messages:
      (2,545)
    • Likes Received:
      (2,915)
    It's your assumptions that many people have a problem with....
    Why can't you take a statement at face value instead of assuming it means something contradictory to your agenda..?
    This is why you are always alone in defending your position against several members at a time...
    Is it possible that you need to change your method of debating to get more respect on this site?
    I guess that's a decision you have to make but the data is indisputable....
     
    crabdancer and Azarkon like this.
  10. Azarkon

    Azarkon I've posted enough I should edit this section

    Location:
    California
    Name:
    Joe
    Boat:
    N/A
    • Messages:
      (1,667)
    • Likes Received:
      (1,271)
    I'll keep that in mind, thanks. When people quote me and respond in the negative I assume they're arguing against what I just said, but goal should always be to keep misunderstanding to a minimum.
     
  11. plj46

    plj46 I've posted enough I should edit this section

    Location:
    Socal
    Name:
    jim
    Boat:
    24 ft grady white
    • Messages:
      (5,631)
    • Likes Received:
      (4,584)
    Here's some research for ya,dead fish don't breed.Baby fish don't breed,especially when dead.
     
  12. Azarkon

    Azarkon I've posted enough I should edit this section

    Location:
    California
    Name:
    Joe
    Boat:
    N/A
    • Messages:
      (1,667)
    • Likes Received:
      (1,271)
    Large fish also don't breed when dead, and they release a lot more eggs. All the while, many of those small fish that you release, won't make it to adults, due to peer competition. That's the trade off.

    Don't take my word for it. Look up "balanced harvesting" - probably the biggest debate in marine biology at the moment - which proposes to remove all size limits for the benefit of the ecosystem.
     
  13. Hardcor

    Hardcor Hardcore

    Location:
    Hardcore
    Name:
    Hardcore
    Boat:
    Hardcore
    • Messages:
      (2,526)
    • Likes Received:
      (7,965)
    448.jpg Corey&Tunas from the Star.png
     
  14. mullet

    mullet Metal Fabricator

    Location:
    San Fernando Valley
    Name:
    Mike
    Boat:
    19"Gregor
    • Messages:
      (3,446)
    • Likes Received:
      (2,922)
    This statement shows how much experience you have with this fishery .It was "10 fish no size limit" and it wasn't changed decades ago.
     
    One_Leg likes this.
  15. the SLIDER

    the SLIDER https://multimediabylj.com

    Location:
    Dana Point
    Name:
    L J
    Boat:
    arima - the SLIDER
    • Messages:
      (1,226)
    • Likes Received:
      (2,274)
    This has turned into quite a shit storm, Azarkon being in the center of the vortex.

    My skiff is small. Fishing inshore out of DP is all I have. That's why Bass are so important to me. I catch way more and better fish now than in the last 30 years since the regulation change. There is always committing a day stalking Biscuits or Butts, but catching them is very few and far between. I would love to see more YT inshore. Letting the thousands of babies go could help to make that happen. A few are going to stick.

    Someone mentioned Global . . . something. Hasn't the weather pattern changed a little in the past 30 years in Socal??? I have been looking towards Oregon to retire. They have way less rain than they used to. Seems to me that IF the warmer weather conditions are moving North, so would the fish. Preserve the opportunity to have more and catch larger.

    And once in a while fish get close enough for me to catch a pelagic.

     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2018
    colemans224, Hardcor and crabdancer like this.
  16. yellowfish26

    yellowfish26 Totally Nude 24/7

    Location:
    Chula Vista/Ca/USA
    Name:
    Jeff
    Boat:
    26ft Seaswirl. The Big Chorizo
    • Messages:
      (652)
    • Likes Received:
      (908)
    Does your boss know how much time you spend during the day arguing about baby Yellows?
     
    hilltop, the SLIDER and crabdancer like this.
  17. the SLIDER

    the SLIDER https://multimediabylj.com

    Location:
    Dana Point
    Name:
    L J
    Boat:
    arima - the SLIDER
    • Messages:
      (1,226)
    • Likes Received:
      (2,274)
    Classic!
     
    Last edited: Jan 11, 2018
    crabdancer likes this.
  18. wils

    wils lazy-ass well known "member"

    Location:
    not a spoiled bitch from san diego
    Name:
    bill
    Boat:
    I hate boats
    • Messages:
      (8,672)
    • Likes Received:
      (4,578)
    Thank you. I kinda figured there would be more to you original quick reply in regards commercial damage.
     
    Hardcor likes this.
  19. Azarkon

    Azarkon I've posted enough I should edit this section

    Location:
    California
    Name:
    Joe
    Boat:
    N/A
    • Messages:
      (1,667)
    • Likes Received:
      (1,271)
    It was changed in 1998, which was indeed decades ago.

    "The department initiated a minimum size limit on sport caught yellowtail during 1998 in an effort to reduce the catch of one-year-old fish." As far as I know, the exemption for five fish under the size limit has always existed, since the beginning.

    The main drop in yellowtail catch came in the 1950s, according to commercial records. Variety of reasons. But from 1960 on, commercial fishing success for yellowtail has been very limited, compared to earlier. The vast majority of sport fish caught in California even 20 years ago were 4 to 12 pounds - 80% of which would be illegal under a 28 inch minimum size restriction. It's still that way today.
     
    Last edited: Jan 11, 2018
  20. mullet

    mullet Metal Fabricator

    Location:
    San Fernando Valley
    Name:
    Mike
    Boat:
    19"Gregor
    • Messages:
      (3,446)
    • Likes Received:
      (2,922)
    To be decades it would have to have been before 1/11/98. The exemption for five fish under did not exist before this time it was 10 fish no size limit.This minimum came into effect because too many people were killing little fish. Now they are killing even smaller ones.
    Argue about it and kill all the micro yellows you want or sack up and try to catch one that actually makes it a challenge.
     
    Paddyman1 and wils like this.

Share This Page