Here we go: Chumash Marine Sanctuary

Tunahead

Long Time Tuna Abused Member
  • Aug 11, 2006
    19,616
    12,261
    Costa Mesa
    Name
    Ron
    Boat Name
    several
    By using their I got here first as an excuse for banning 7000 square miles of fishing water that they didn't even use during their 15,000 year history. Sounds so noble till you realize "They" protected everywhere you fished with any excuse they can find like MPA's, the 30/30 scam, etc till there's no place to fish. Not picking on the Indians per say this is just the latest excuse why we can fish certain waters.
    Sorry NOPE! ...NO BAN ON FISHING....READ..even the
    Chumash said no ban on fishing. LOL
     
    Last edited:
    Blackfish
    Blackfish
    Relax a little. You have responded twice to the same comment. How about, "You're incorrect", and then show how or why his statement and info is wrong, in your view. That's how a casual cordial conversation goes.
    Upvote 0
    Upvote 0

    Tunahead

    Long Time Tuna Abused Member
  • Aug 11, 2006
    19,616
    12,261
    Costa Mesa
    Name
    Ron
    Boat Name
    several
    This video by the Chumash folks sates that there will be no restrictions to fishing. I hope that winds up being the case as there will probably be people involved in the process that will push for no-take zones in some parts of the sanctuary.
    Well there ya go. Even the windmills offshore
    are "Under Consideration" . Over and out. LOL
     
    Upvote 0

    fishing for memories

    Watch Our YouTube Like & Subscribe
  • Oct 23, 2020
    145
    380
    MDR
    www.youtube.com
    Name
    Fishing for Memories
    Boat Name
    Parker 2120
    Just spotted this on Instagram.
    Screenshot_20211221-210725_Instagram.jpg
     
    Upvote 0

    woodfish330

    I'm to smart to figure out how to edit this.
  • Aug 14, 2012
    2,651
    6,356
    San Fransisco,CA USA
    Name
    John
    Boat Name
    Fishead
    To take from the "many"....and give to the "few"... is not justice. Is not fair. Is not right.

    IT wasn't right 300 years ago.... and is not the proper and equitable solution today. Yet we still use those same "mechanisms" .... that have failed us "Historically"...over and over.

    Take away from the "many" .... and give to the "few".
     
    • Like
    Reactions: pete j
    Upvote 0

    sdapguy

    Almost A Member
    Sep 25, 2020
    246
    296
    58
    US
    Name
    D P
    Boat Name
    1994 15' Dauntless Whaler
    If they really cared about the Indians, why did the push the I-15 expansion when they found burial sites by Lake Hodges??? Did they notify the Kumeyaay for proper archaeological research and respectful relocation of remains? Newsome had to give auntie Pelosi some retirement income by pushing the electric vehicle sales in CA and it will probably be her husband's companies who are in the wind farm projects to create electricity. How else are they going to charge all those vehicles, mowers, chainsaws. landscaping equipment, generators, etc.? Create a need then capitalize on the insider knowledge to create a "fix". Kinda like how she gave $200 million from one of the big Bills she passed to the Conservatory, which was supposed to raise it's own money and couldn't. The $200 mil funds the transportation to be within blocks of husband's real estate project, increasing it's value. The rest of the country is now paying for CA's political greed. Thank you for helping us out!!! When they passed the $15 per hour minimum wage, did it include the American Samoa residents canning hubbies tuna?
     
    Upvote 0